Growing up in England,
most children are brought up with the idea of Britishness, and, as I
will continue to explain, an idea is all it is. I too used to be
fiercely ‘British’, I would display the union flag at any
opportunity, proclaiming my love for our countries heritage. Then,
slowly, I came to the realisation that all was not well in ol’
Blighty. ‘British’ history has been deliberately mis-taught for
generations for the sole purpose of keeping English identity to a
minimum whilst promoting the Imperialistic non-entity known as
Britain. As added insult, the English are also usually blamed for all
the atrocities committed by the ‘British Empire’, including the
Scottish who of course were the ones who forged the British Empire to
begin with.
If you think I'm
talking crap, let us take a (relatively) quick tour of the United
Kingdom’s history:
The first lie comes
from the idea of there ever being a race called ‘The Celts’.
Indeed Celt seems in recent times to denote someone who resides in
the UK or Ireland and is an indigenous person to these lands. Truth
is, there was never a single cultural or racial group known simply as
‘the Celts’. There had been waves upon waves of small settler
groups from the continent all throughout the neolithic period and
bronze age – all of whom displaced the earlier group. That been
said, it has been noted that during the Neolithic period, all
Northern European cultures (Germanic and ‘Celtic’) were very
similar which seems to suggest a common lineage. Essentially there is
no difference between someone of whom is of Germanic origin, and
someone who is of Celtic origin.
Why is this important?
Well it is very important on account of the fact that in recent times
they’ve used immigration to break social cohesion and national
identity in the UK, and in England in particular. In many instances
our race replacement programme is justified by the likes of the BBC
etc because of the fact that ‘all English are foreign anyway.’
Well, no actually. Our people have always lived in Northern Europe.
Skipping the Roman
conquest entirely, we then get onto the creation of England. After
the fall of the Roman Empire the King of the Britons Vortigern,
essentially paid protection money to the Anglo-Saxons to stop them
marauding their coasts with the absence of Roman naval units - but
eventually, after a few attempts to butter the Saxons up, they went
on to take England by force from all the independent tribes. England
then, is a completely separate nation from Wales (which ironically
means Foreigners in Old English) and the Scots to the North.
For some time, England
suffered with a terrible war of attrition with the Danes which
effectively at one point left England with only the far South West,
but was eventually able to regain control of the most of England. Of
course, in 1066, the English suffered a great defeat, a defeat which
has seen the English people enslaved ever since. Some may scoff at
this notion, but here are the facts. With the Norman conquest came a
genocide and a complete upheaval of a class system. Before the Norman
conquest, England's societal system was mostly based on merit. It was
quite possible to start life as a servant and become someone of
influence and power later in life. With the Norman system came the
consensus, harsh taxes and the super-elite. Whilst the serfs worked
night and day to survive, the Norman nobility stuffed their faces.
(In fact, the Normans never used plates, they ate their meat off of
blocks of bread which was given as a meal to the servants
afterwards.)
So why is this
important?
Because it proves that
no English nobility stood at all after 1066, and the class system in
this country has always been horrific. Even today, class in Britain
transcends profession and monetary accumulation. Someone can tell
another person's ‘class’ merely by their accent. All political
decisions for nearly a thousand years have been made by a super-class
of usurper bastards.
Even after the Civil
War which Oliver Cromwell the Parliamentarian won against the
Royalists, we were still dicked because all the anti-Jewry laws which
were repealed in order for us to take on a debt based ‘modern’
banking system.
Now onto the
interesting part.
England is always seen
as being the main nation behind the British Empire, but is this
really true? After Queen Elizabeth I’s death, the crown passed to
James I, her Nephew who was from the Scottish throne. Then since
then, up until the arrival of the Saxe-Coburg and Gotha crew, all
monarchs were either Scottish, or German.
So when did the United
Kingdom become united? Well, despite the same throne been held in
both the Scottish and English state for a long time before, the union
never came about until 1707, but it was done to stop Scotland going
bankrupt after they tried their own bit of territorial expansionism
in Panama, and to stop them from ever becoming allies with the French
again like they had so many times before (which was actually the main
reason for the film Braveheart because Scotland kept aiding France.)
No one was ever asked, and the only people who have ever done badly
from the British state are the main contributors: the English.
Of course the English civil war in (1642–1651) was fought against King Charles I, the main reason for that war was to prevent the monarch from uniting England and Scotland because the opponents were concerned that such a move would but English customs and traditions in danger.
Of course the English civil war in (1642–1651) was fought against King Charles I, the main reason for that war was to prevent the monarch from uniting England and Scotland because the opponents were concerned that such a move would but English customs and traditions in danger.
Ironically after a long and bloody civil war only fifty years later the Parliament had reinstated a monarch as a constitutional monarchy and signed an agreement which united Scotland and England. The true purpose of the Civil war must therefore be looked at in scrutiny and it is a well known fact that Cromwell's round-heads repealed the usury laws and allowed Jewish banks to start dominating England (and later on allowed the sell out of Scotland too.)
There remains facts however that some people who remain hateful of the English seem to ignore. Despite the
pressure from various monarchs and the imposed imperialism over the years from foreign powers and banking interests,
England still managed to contribute so much liberty to the world
which remains as a beacon of hope and justice throughout the
world. It is generally forgotten that Britain banned slavery around
the same time the United States did. It is conveniently not mentioned
that the English legal system was based on evidence, and presumption
of innocence rather than the usual presumption of guilt like in other
nations, it is conveniently not mentioned that the Magna Carta and
the Bill of Rights is the corner stone of modern freedoms, both of which came from peaceful English reforms.
Another thing which seems ironic is that a
term used by liberals these days against English nationalists is
‘Little Englanders’. This term can correctly be tracked back to the days of the British Empire where the
term ‘Little Englander’ was coined for English who disagreed with
Britain's Imperialistic approach, and the creation of the British
state. This would seem to imply that the 'nasty, filthy nationalists' are actually against the kind of international pillage that faux-liberalism seems to support.
Lastly, let us not
forget from where most of the prominent secret societies now based in
the states originated – Scotland, not England.
So why do I feel this
article is important?
That is simple. I grow
tired of hearing from groups whether they are African, American or
Scottish about how bad we English are, when in actual fact, our
history was not ours to control. We have been at the mercy of Norman
and German hierarchs, Scottish bloodlines and foreign banks for a
very long time. I'm not saying we are perfect, but I would just like
to say that we deserve to exist as a nation and as a people. We do
not deserve to be deliberately forced out of our homeland by
migrants, nor do we deserve the sole blame for all of the atrocities
played out by the British Empire.
Britain is a term
meaning slavery. Slavery for all of us involved. I only hope that the
Scottish vote for their independence in the next coming years as it
will grant us a loop hole to take back control of our destiny also –
from both the British state, and the EU (since we joined as the UK,
not separate nation states.)
